Woke leftists simply oppose the military action of some states but uniquely hate Israel with a visceral passion. Indeed, a clear and ugly implication underlies all the far-left criticism of Israel’s conduct: that Israelis should just let themselves be killed by Hamas’s rockets rather than fight back.
A fascinating poll will be released soon on how Americans feel about race in this country vs. what the left is feeding the media. We believe you’ll find the results interesting.
If Kerry, now President Biden’s special envoy for climate, really did reveal information about Israeli covert operations to Zarif, that’s outrageous. It would mean he betrayed our Israeli friends to benefit an Iranian regime that chants “death to America” and “death to Israel.”
There are simply too many developing stories to follow in the world. To make things easier, we narrowed them down to five that you should really watch next week
This is why the left hailed Chauvin’s conviction as a victory in the fight for racial justice: Convicting him meant convicting America of systemic racism.
Some analysts say not to worry about this rapid modernization because China has far fewer nuclear weapons than the US. They are sorely mistaken.
“I’m a nice guy and not Donald Trump,” was Biden’s case for the presidency. “I’ll end the chaos and return us to normalcy.” This was his electoral mandate: to govern as a boring, comfortable moderate. To be an old and tired president with low energy who was simply not his predecessor, nothing more.
The Obama administration’s toxic campaign to defend a severely flawed deal fostered visceral partisanship at home. The result has been devastating: A country so divided on Iran cannot create effective, enduring policies to combat Iran’s nuclear and imperial ambitions.
When we look at illegal immigration as a matter of national security, terrorism isn’t the only threat. Of perhaps greater concern is espionage — the prospect of adversarial countries such as Iran sending agents to spy rather than attack.
Last month, some 200 activists and academics unveiled a new and dangerous definition of antisemitism explicitly meant to undermine and replace IHRA’s version. What’s so remarkable about this “new” definition is that its authors seem far more concerned with protecting people accused of antisemitism than with protecting Jews victimized by antisemitism.
